20070523

The "Bigger Target" Myth:

During my education process, I have heard the following myth uttered by a few students, and even a professor or two: "Linux isn't really more secure than Windows, it's just that Windows is a bigger target, and attracts more attention from the hackers."

This is absolutely false. In the web-server market, Apache is the dominant force. If I want a big target, apache is the way to go. And of course, Apache is most commonly found on Linux servers. So Linux is *NOT a smaller target.

There are two major and concrete reasons for Linux's superior security record.

The first, is the structure of the UNIX file system. Being a copy of Unix, Linux inherited Unix's basic file structure. Because Unix was a multi-user operating system from the start, Unix has built in security measures to keep users from accessing files that they are not authorized to. While not perfect by any means this is an advantage when compared to Windows based systems that started as a single user operating system giving the user full access to everything.

The second, and perhaps the most important reason is simply "peer review." Peer review is common in almost every discipline EXCEPT software engineering. The concept is simple; before your idea is accepted as valid, it must FIRST be independently reviewed by a body of qualified peers. An example of this is Civil Engineering. A city government would never consider awarding a bridge building contract to a firm until a thorough outside review concluded that the design was for that bridge was architecturally sound and valid.

In the open source community this practice is the norm. Every bit is public knowledge and ever algorithm is exposed. When flaws are discovered, either the discoverer patches it, or the author of the software is notified of the error. Conversely, commercial software makers keep their code a secret and simply HOPE that attackers do not discover their holes.

If and only IF Microsoft allows their code to be validated by outside engineers will they EVER be as secure as Linux. That "bigger target" myth is simply a bunch of BULL.

20070521

Google Apps Partner-Edition

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/05/google-apps-partner-edition.html

Ie: dump that aging sendmail server and port your users over to gmail (with 10 GB boxes) I definitely want to check that out. Darkside: Google gets all your users' info. Answer: who cares?

20070509

Reiser Murder Plot thickens

The investigation of the murder of Nina Reiser took an interesting twist this week that may shift suspicion off of Hans Reiser. A former lover of Nina Reiser's; Sean Sturgeon has confessed to 8 other murders not related to the case. This may present a challenge to the prosecution.

Posted on LinuxToday: Nina Reiser Couldn't Win

20070507

MySql Migration

Saving this one for later, I'm mostly concerned with going from mysql to MS sql, but this could come in handy. LINK

Virtual Strength

Virtual Strength

Here's a neat article I found. It's actually a little old, but it's new to me. I always wondered what life will be like when we all have super human strength, be it through genetic alterations or artificial limbs. If we could all be like Michael Jordan, what would be the point of being Michael Jordan? What would this mean for Olympic competition?